.




We all live in two Worlds...




...and time is not a clock, but a story.



While this blog intends to address a wide range of subjects, it is mainly, if tacitly, about explaining things through a particular story of the origin of human beings. Generally, modern history is like the last five minutes of the most important movie of your life: only if you know what the beginning was like can you see what is really going on.




Specifically, for example, Karl Marx's Communism is a prominent case of what happens when people try to make the best sense of the present world in its own terms. For Marx, he took some of the centrally sacred things of life (especially the family as the core of society, and the direct economic equity with which the family functions within itself) and used these as a way to criminalize most of the profane things of life (especially the natural economic autonomy of individuals, families, and tribes). Karl Marx was an idealist with a subset of all ideals, but, since he had concluded that there were no more ideals than those he adored, he was forced either to pursue his particular ideals by pragmatic means or to admit to being powerless-and-ignorant. Curiously, the chorus of every ideal that there is, produced when each of them is given a voice, sounds very much like pragmatism to anyone whose ear is familiar only with some subset of them.




Another case of trying to make the best sense of life while taking the present world at face value is Ayn Rand's Objectivism. Rand sanctified the economic autonomy of individuals while rejecting economic altruism as necessarily repressive of a healthy self-interest.




Note the ironic dynamic of genders here,: a woman came up with Greed-and-competition-ism, and a man came up with Communism. Women are most susceptible to being over-used regarding their orientation toward social matters, that is, toward the needs of others; and men are most susceptible to being over-used regarding their competitive, and otherwise non-social, drives. So, the man went the opposite of his normal way, and likewise the woman, but neither for the interest of the other, but, rather, each for their own escape, and this by mere aggrandizement of their ego.




Even the Bible is readily misunderstood by human beings who, despite being Christians, assume that the wisdom necessary for life in the fallen world was likewise necessary for the original world. These particular human beings as easily assume that the Bible is a Complete Idiot's Guide as atheists assume that the Bible is A Guide To Being An Idiot. Either way, humans tend to assume that the Bible is The Authorized Foolproof Version (athiests merely see it as foolproof idiocy).




Both the original and the present worlds can rightly be understood only in terms of the original world (whatever that world was, whether that according to Steven Pinker, or that according to a childlike reading of Genesis 1). That's why the Bible begins with an account of an original world---an account to which Christ sometimes referred when answering the challenges of the religious leaders of his day.




Civilization is not primarily the material and economic things we produce. It is primarily the infrastructure of histori-social, histori-political, and histori-moral wisdom that allows a kind of society able to produce these things. So, the one thing most necessary for preserving civilization is not any of its physical manifestations, rather it is a right understanding (at least in effect) of the world's 'first five minutes.'




Education is the telling of, and the learning from, the true story. So, the 'place of stories' is naturally sacred: the public library. The library is at the very heart of open, or public, education. In a pluralistic democratic society, the library thus naturally has a wide range of competing stories. It was so even in the beginning of Israel, though the kinds of stories allowed were not so vastly different from each other as are those in the public libraries of a secular (studiously clueless-and-narrow-minded) nation.




As for the contentions today over educational matters, human education is sacred (yours, and mine, and thus our respective children’s), not to be subsumed by any narrow interest, whether material and financial profit, legal status, job security, bureaucratic accountability, technical competence, patent rights, private vs. public, state vs. federal, etc.. There is not one narrow interest that, to the exclusion of others, can cause the education of a nation’s children to be better in the long run than can any other narrow interest. This is because, in regard to making any narrow-and-exclusive interest into the singular foundation of overall life-success, there is no long run but into the ground. Not even God ‘plays God’.










.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

The Anthropic Puzzle, and the Nature of Human Epistemology

Imagine you find a twenty-four-thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle in a thrift store. You assume it is twenty-four-thousand pieces because that's what it says on the box---and it's a huge box. The only other thing on the box is a picture of a man. There are no explanations.

The price tag sticker on the box says "2 cents". When you look inside the box, you see only a bunch of normal-sized pure black puzzle pieces that shimmer in the light. Despite the large number of pieces, you find this puzzle compelling. You estimate that its assembled size would be about 144 square feet---not too big for your living room floor.

So, out of an odd curiosity, you buy the puzzle and take it home. After all, it only cost you two cents. As you begin laying out the pieces on the floor, you notice that they all are randomly shaped on two opposing sides, while the other two sides are shaped like normal jigsaw puzzle pieces.

A few months later you have assembled enough groups of the pieces to realize that there is nothing random about the 'random' sides of the pieces: the puzzle is just a really huge border outlining the shape of a man. But, there is still something about this puzzle that puzzles you. Eventually, you get a hunch. You get working.

Your hunch is right: the shimmering quality of the pieces are parts of a faint hologram when laid out in a grid, with each piece simply abutting adjacent pieces. The hologram is of the words "You asked for it: my two cents."

At this point, you take a trip back to the thrift store to ask the employees, and hopefully also the owner, about this puzzle. You want to know who made it, and why. Strangely, every employee you find is identically reticent in their answer. They all reply with a shrug and say, "It's just a puzzle." This gets on your nerves.

Weeks go by before you finally track down so much as the store owner's phone number. It's an unlisted number---which increases your irritation. You call him up, your hands shaking in frustration, and you beg him to tell you about the puzzle. He replies simply, "It's just a puzzle". You explode.

You scream through the phone at him, demanding that he explain why everyone who knows about the puzzle keeps giving that same non-answer.

He replies that "that's the whole point: it's just a puzzle: the actual world is already assembled, and you're down in it."

"I'm down in it?", you ask. "What does that mean?"

He replies, "From your perspective, the actual world is highly topographic, and you are not able to look down on it. The only thing you can look down on is the puzzle itself----like a paper map of the world, it's not the actual world down in which you live. If you want to understand the world, you have to understand your relative position in it. You have to be willing to look up."

After a few moments of silence, you ask him, "Who made the puzzle?"

"You did." he says.

"I mean, who made the pieces?"

He hems and haws for a bit, and then says, "Why..., do you want your two cents back?"
How is it that you do not know that you shall judge angels? The reason you don't know this, Preacher Boy, is because you do not think, you simply 'believe what the Word of God says' as if it were flowery incantations of purest revelation. Rape and the marriage act are quite alike in form, but are as far apart in spirit as any two things can be. The Gospel is the same way, which means that discernment is based not on evidence, but on knowledge.

We all die eventually, so capital punishment---a kind of war---is simply to cause the guilty to meet his end sooner, and to remove his care from the righteous. God's mercy is founded primarily not on His character, but on the fact that He has the character to recognize, and to act in solidarity with, those who find their lives difficult---including those who find themselves mistaken for the 'Superman to Superman' by those who love to wield Holy Kryptonite. The one who murders the body is not the most guilty, it is the one who, in hasty and self-aggrandizing use the Word of God, rapes and murders the soul. Nothing can make the soul more unwhole than those who use the form of the Truth as a weapon against what are, in fact, Unknown Soldiers.


Resurrection Peninsula, Alaska